Pro-Slavery Arguments Essay

thrall was at its peak both stinting completelyy and controversially during the 19th coke. The prosla real forces of the s come out of the closeth proposed legion(predicate) courses to take hold their institution that they held dear. Legal, organized religion, and scotch airs were all apply to justify their control of slavery. The largest falsification of slavery came from the political aspects of it.Legal telephone lines and defenses were occasiond more frequently than any concomitantor of support. The largest attempts to save slavery came through compromises. manhoody a(prenominal) noteworthy compromises aroused during the 19th century over slavery and the territories. The compromise that stands out more than any other was the second Compromise of 1820 which verbalise that any in the buff territory above 3630 would be free, and any territory due southward of that line would be slave. This settled the argument of slavery for a little term and was a great way of temporarily preserving their institution. Another argument used in support of slavery was that slaves were property, and individuals had the integral function to their property.With this defense, it gave them a constitutional advantage. Another famous decision in favor of the southwestward was the Dred Scott decision. This Supreme apostrophize decision allowed proslavery forces to use the argument that blacks were not people whence they had no constitutional rights including freedom. This was another constitutional advantage that came from a Supreme Court interpretation of the constitution. The south presented a dangerous argument to preserve slavery with these wakeless arguments however in that respect were also the economic and apparitional aspects to take into consideration as well.There were many economical aspects to the interrogation over slavery. The south presented the necessity of slave labor for prosperity as genius example. Without the use of slavery, planta tions and cash crops wouldnt nourish succeeded nearly as well because on that point was entirely not enough man power to equal the labor that the slaves puke in. This would have affected the whole commonwealth but more predominantly the south because cash crops were their most significant economic activity by far. Another argument was that slavery would never expand sum because they had no use for land matrimony of the 3630 line because it simply wasnt fit for producing cash crops or housing plantations.Only the southern lands were productive and climatic enough tomeet their needs. mavin more significant economic argument used to back up slavery was slaves were treated better working on plantations than free blacks were in the north. Plantation owners wanted to keep excellent care for their slaves because without gritty moral and work force, they would be useless. Therefore, plantations offered 3 meals a day, housing, and many other perks for slaves in which most free bla cks couldnt summation on their small incomes. This was a head word point often made by the south. Religion also played a key role for southerners and their fight to defend slavery.Slavery was often defended by Christianity and religion in the South. Southerners often used the playscript itself to justify slavery, citing how slavery has always existed from scriptural times to what was their present day. They argued that it was a fact of life and was meant to be. Proslavery forces even went to the extreme in saying that delivery boy himself found goose egg wrong with slavery and he excessively accepted and embraced it. Never once was there a citing in the Bible of Jesus frustration with slavery they argued.Last of all, they stated that they were cattle ranch Christianity by introducing Africans to Christianity and converting them therefore spreading the word of God and Christianity more and more. They were Africans more civilized by converting them and introducing them to their religious ways. These were the religious arguments on behalf of the South for the most part. exclusively in all, the South presented a very strong case in support of their ideals. By incorporating all of these religious, economic, and legal aspects into their defense, they offered a persuasive defense of their sacred institution.